Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 vs Fruitvale Elementary
VT · 1,647 students • CA · 3,069 students • fiscal year 2024 • swap sides
In one line
- Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 spends 22% more per student than Fruitvale Elementary after adjusting for local price levels.
- Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 directs 15 more cents of every operating dollar to instruction than Fruitvale Elementary.
- Fruitvale Elementary is far more dependent on local property taxes (23% of revenue vs 2%), which ties its budget more tightly to local property values.
- Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 reports fewer students per teacher (18.1 vs 21.2). This is a staffing ratio, not an average class size.
Are these even comparable?
Establish the shape of each district before reading a single dollar figure.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Students enrolled | 1,647 | 3,069 |
| Schools | 5 | 5 |
| Grades served | PK–12 | K–8 |
| Setting | Rural | City |
| County | Bennington County | Kern County |
| State | VT | CA |
| Local price level (US = 100) Above 100 means a dollar buys less here than the national average. | 98.0 | 100.9 |
The headline dollar
Current operating spending per student, shown three ways. The first is what each district reports. The second and third are the honest ones for comparison.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Per student, as reported | $18,567 | $15,706 |
| Per student, price-adjusted Divided by the local price level, so both figures are in the same money. | $18,954 | $15,568 |
| Per student, price-adjusted, excluding transport Transportation provision varies enormously between districts and states. Removing it compares the parts both districts actually do. | $18,586 | $15,254 |
| Capital spending per student Buildings and land, never folded into the operating figures above. It is lumpy: a district mid-build looks expensive for two years. | Locked | Locked |
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
Fruitvale Elementary
Where the money comes from
The funding mix determines how exposed a district is to local property values, to state politics, and to federal programmes ending.
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
- Local 2.4% Locked
- State 97.1% Locked
- Federal 0.5% Locked
Fruitvale Elementary
- Local 22.9% Locked
- State 70.0% Locked
- Federal 7.1% Locked
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Local share of revenue Mostly property tax. A high share means school budgets track local property values, up and down. | 2.4% | 22.9% |
| State share of revenue | 97.1% | 70.0% |
| Federal share of revenue | 0.5% | 7.1% |
| Total revenue | Locked | Locked |
How VT funds its districts
We have not yet written up VT's funding formula, so nothing is claimed here.
How CA funds its districts
LCFF — Local Control Funding Formula: a base grant per pupil plus supplemental and concentration grants driven by low-income, English-learner and foster-youth counts.
Where the money goes
The same slices in the same order for both districts, plus the differences by function — because two pie charts side by side hide exactly the thing you want to see.
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
- Instruction 77.3% Locked
- Instructional staff support 2.6% Locked
- Student support 3.3% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 5.0% Locked
- Transportation 1.9% Locked
- Food service 2.0% Locked
- School administration 4.0% Locked
- District administration 1.4% Locked
- Other support 0.7% Locked
- Other current 2.1% Locked
Fruitvale Elementary
- Instruction 59.3% Locked
- Instructional staff support 5.3% Locked
- Student support 7.2% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 11.8% Locked
- Transportation 2.0% Locked
- Food service 3.6% Locked
- School administration 3.7% Locked
- District administration 2.4% Locked
- Other support 3.9% Locked
- Other current 3.7% Locked
What is actually different
Share of each district's operating dollar, Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 minus Fruitvale Elementary. Two pie charts side by side are almost impossible to read against each other; this is the same data as one chart.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Cents of each operating dollar reaching classrooms Instruction plus instructional staff support, as a share of current spending. | 79.9% | 64.5% |
| Administration share District office plus school administration. | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Transportation share | 1.9% | 2.0% |
What the money buys
Staffing levels are the most direct thing a budget converts into.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Students per teacher This is a staffing ratio: total enrollment divided by teaching staff. It is NOT average class size. Actual classes are larger than this number in every district. | 18.1 | 21.2 |
| Students per counselor | Locked | Locked |
| Students per administrator | Locked | Locked |
| Total salaries All staff, not teachers alone. | Locked | Locked |
Who they serve
The answer to "but they serve different kids" — which is usually a fair objection.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Child poverty rate Children aged 5 to 17 in poverty within the district boundary. Used instead of free-lunch eligibility, which community eligibility has made unusable for comparison. | — | 14.4% |
| English learners | — | — |
| Students with disabilities | — | — |
| Enrollment change, 5 years | -4.9% | -5.0% |
Results, and results for the money
Stability and risk
The homebuyer’s real question: what is likely to change after I move in?
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
No stability flags raised.
Fruitvale Elementary
- Declining enrollment Enrollment fell more than 5% over five years. Enrollment decline is the single best predictor of school closures and programme cuts.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment change, 5 years | -4.9% | -5.0% |
| Long-term debt per student | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service share of spending | Locked | Locked |
Enrolling a child
Is a seat at your zoned school guaranteed?
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
Fruitvale Elementary
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
- This is the district’s own published wording, not our summary of it. Policies are rewritten between enrollment seasons and a page can be out of date the day after we read it — the school office is the only authority on whether a particular grade at a particular school is full right now.
- A warning here is about capacity, not about your address. It does not mean your child will be moved; it means the district has told you in writing that it may move them.
Comparability notes
- Cross-state comparison. Dollars below are shown both as reported and adjusted to a common price level, because a dollar buys different amounts of teacher in VT and CA.
- At least one district sits outside a metro area with its own published price index, so its cost adjustment uses the statewide index. That is a coarser adjustment.
What these numbers are, exactly
Who decides, and what it costs you
Every band above this one asks what a district spends. This one asks who chose to.
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
Local money, but not a school property tax
This district reports local revenue that is neither a property tax of its own nor a county appropriation, and the source is not named. Two thirds of the districts in this position are New England regional districts, where each member town raises its share — but the rest span Alaska, Arizona and Tennessee, whose arrangements are nothing like that and nothing like each other. What is certain is only that local money reaches these schools by some route the school board does not levy itself.
Fruitvale Elementary
The district levies its own school tax
This district raises property tax in its own name. Who sets the rate varies by state — an elected board in some, a public vote in others — but the levy is the school system’s own, and it is the part of a tax bill that school politics moves most directly.
| Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Fruitvale Elementary | |
|---|---|---|
| School property tax levied, per student Only for districts that levy in their own name. Blank where the county or town levies instead — see the cards above, and read the next row. | — | $2,544 |
| Appropriated by the county or town, per student What the parent government handed the schools, for dependent systems. This is a general appropriation, not solely property tax. | — | — |
| Property tax as a share of all revenue How much of the budget rides on local property values, and therefore on local votes. | — | 13.4% |
| Long-term debt already owed, per student The balance at the end of the year, for scale. Repaid over decades, so it is a commitment made by earlier boards rather than a bill arriving now. | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service as a share of spending Interest plus principal repaid this year, against total spending. This is the part of the debt that is being paid now, out of money that would otherwise reach a classroom. | Locked | Locked |
| New long-term debt issued, per student Money borrowed during fiscal year 2024. What this figure does and does not tell you is set out under the table. | $0 | $70 |
- Taconic and Green Regional School District #63: issued no new long-term debt in fiscal year 2024. That is a reported zero, not a gap in the data.
- A figure in the borrowing row is not a bond voters approved. It records debt issued, and that includes refinancing existing debt at a new rate — which changes nothing about what a district owes — as well as certificates of participation and lease-revenue debt, which in many states a board can issue with no referendum at all. To find out what was actually on a ballot, check the county election office.
- Debt is repaid over decades. A large balance per student is a commitment made by earlier boards and earlier voters, not a bill arriving this year. The debt service row above it is the part being paid now.
Funding measures on the ballot
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63
This district appears in none of what we read from VT’s source in its current ballot window (2026).
What this state publishes: Vermont's Secretary of State publishes vote counts and never a declared outcome, so no row here says whether a Vermont budget passed — the numbers are the state's, the arithmetic is yours. Only the annual school budget article under 16 V.S.A. § 563 is read: bonds, articles that never name their district, and the budgets of unified union districts are all left out, because a union's budget reaches this source as one member town's slice and no field totals the members. Some elections the state lists carry no results at all — a town's third budget attempt can be warned here and never canvassed here. And the static results tree carries only the current cycle, so a district's older votes are not here at all.
Fruitvale Elementary
$88.8M approved by voters across 3 measures.
| Election | Measure | Amount | Yes | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-05 | Bond · Prop. Measure KTo repair/replace deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; improve safety/security systems and disability access; rem ove asbestos and lead pi…To repair/replace deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; improve safety/security systems and disability access; rem ove asbestos and lead pipes; upgrade older classrooms, labs, school facilities to support student achievement in math, science engi neering, arts and technology; shall Fruitvale School District's measure authorizing $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying average rates of 3¢ per $100 as sessed value (estimated $2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money locally controlled? |
$36M | 60.9% | Passed |
Locked 3 earlier measures in this district’s history are not shown.
From the state’s own election file. Latest election on record: 2025-06-03.
What this state publishes: School district bonds and parcel taxes as the California Elections Data Archive compiles them for the Secretary of State. Bonds carry the principal; parcel taxes are quoted per parcel and carry no comparable dollar figure. Recalls and advisory questions are not included.
CA published no results for 2010, so a measure put to voters in that year would not appear here. That is a gap in the state’s own publishing.
- A vote share is not an outcome. What it takes to carry varies by state and by measure — in some states a bond needs a supermajority and a minimum turnout while a levy on the same ballot needs half, so a clear majority can still lose. Every outcome shown here is copied from the state’s own election file, and the rule that applied is stated with the coverage above. Where that file stated no outcome we show whatever count it published and no verdict, rather than working one out from the percentage — and some states publish the ballot question without ever recording a count, so a blank there is a number nobody printed.
- These are the measures a district put to its voters, not its whole tax bill. A property tax bill also carries county, city and state levies that have nothing to do with schools, and in most states a school board can issue some kinds of debt with no vote at all.
What this band does not answer yet
The detailed figures for Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 and Fruitvale Elementary
The verdict, the headline dollar, the funding shares, who is served and every comparability caveat are free above, and stay free. What is behind the lock is the detail you would want before acting on any of it:
- capital spending per student
- total revenue and total current spending, and the funding mix in dollars (the percentage shares stay free)
- the ten-line per-student breakdown of where the money goes
- counselor and administrator ratios, and the total salary bill
- the debt behind the risk flags — per student, and as a share of spending
- the full ballot history: 3 more bonds and levies, with the amounts
$1.79 for both, for three months, 21 cents less than buying them one at a time.
The 3-month unlock is a single payment and does not renew; it simply ends. A subscription renews, monthly or yearly as chosen, until you cancel. No account to create: this purchase is held in this browser, so clearing site data or moving to another browser loses it, and the phone apps sell their own unlock through their own store. What to do if you lose it.
Compare something else
Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 on its own · Fruitvale Elementary on its own