Ashburnham-Westminster vs Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
MA · 2,255 students • CO · 2,509 students • fiscal year 2024 • swap sides
In one line
- Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 spends 4% more per student than Ashburnham-Westminster after adjusting for local price levels.
- Ashburnham-Westminster directs 7 more cents of every operating dollar to instruction than Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2.
- Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 is far more dependent on local property taxes (67% of revenue vs 47%), which ties its budget more tightly to local property values.
Are these even comparable?
Establish the shape of each district before reading a single dollar figure.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Students enrolled | 2,255 | 2,509 |
| Schools | 5 | 7 |
| Grades served | PK–12 | PK–12 |
| Setting | Rural | Town |
| County | Worcester County | Routt County |
| State | MA | CO |
| Local price level (US = 100) Above 100 means a dollar buys less here than the national average. | 102.5 | 103.1 |
The headline dollar
Current operating spending per student, shown three ways. The first is what each district reports. The second and third are the honest ones for comparison.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Per student, as reported | $17,558 | $18,271 |
| Per student, price-adjusted Divided by the local price level, so both figures are in the same money. | $17,126 | $17,730 |
| Per student, price-adjusted, excluding transport Transportation provision varies enormously between districts and states. Removing it compares the parts both districts actually do. | $16,018 | $17,216 |
| Capital spending per student Buildings and land, never folded into the operating figures above. It is lumpy: a district mid-build looks expensive for two years. | Locked | Locked |
Ashburnham-Westminster
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
Where the money comes from
The funding mix determines how exposed a district is to local property values, to state politics, and to federal programmes ending.
Ashburnham-Westminster
- Local 46.7% Locked
- State 46.6% Locked
- Federal 6.6% Locked
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
- Local 67.1% Locked
- State 30.4% Locked
- Federal 2.6% Locked
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Local share of revenue Mostly property tax. A high share means school budgets track local property values, up and down. | 46.7% | 67.1% |
| State share of revenue | 46.6% | 30.4% |
| Federal share of revenue | 6.6% | 2.6% |
| Total revenue | Locked | Locked |
How MA funds its districts
Chapter 70: a foundation budget per district with a required local contribution based on municipal wealth.
How CO funds its districts
The School Finance Act: a statewide base per pupil adjusted by a cost-of-living and size factor, funded by local property tax topped up by the state.
Where the money goes
The same slices in the same order for both districts, plus the differences by function — because two pie charts side by side hide exactly the thing you want to see.
Ashburnham-Westminster
- Instruction 62.1% Locked
- Instructional staff support 4.2% Locked
- Student support 8.2% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 9.5% Locked
- Transportation 6.5% Locked
- Food service 0.0% Locked
- School administration 4.6% Locked
- District administration 1.3% Locked
- Other support 1.9% Locked
- Other current 0.0% Locked
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
- Instruction 54.1% Locked
- Instructional staff support 5.4% Locked
- Student support 6.7% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 8.7% Locked
- Transportation 2.9% Locked
- Food service 2.0% Locked
- School administration 6.5% Locked
- District administration 1.9% Locked
- Other support 11.6% Locked
- Other current 2.0% Locked
What is actually different
Share of each district's operating dollar, Ashburnham-Westminster minus Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2. Two pie charts side by side are almost impossible to read against each other; this is the same data as one chart.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cents of each operating dollar reaching classrooms Instruction plus instructional staff support, as a share of current spending. | 66.2% | 59.4% |
| Administration share District office plus school administration. | 5.9% | 8.5% |
| Transportation share | 6.5% | 2.9% |
What the money buys
Staffing levels are the most direct thing a budget converts into.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Students per teacher This is a staffing ratio: total enrollment divided by teaching staff. It is NOT average class size. Actual classes are larger than this number in every district. | 13.6 | 12.9 |
| Students per counselor | Locked | Locked |
| Students per administrator | Locked | Locked |
| Total salaries All staff, not teachers alone. | Locked | Locked |
Who they serve
The answer to "but they serve different kids" — which is usually a fair objection.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Child poverty rate Children aged 5 to 17 in poverty within the district boundary. Used instead of free-lunch eligibility, which community eligibility has made unusable for comparison. | 3.5% | 4.7% |
| English learners | — | — |
| Students with disabilities | — | — |
| Enrollment change, 5 years | -4.2% | -5.4% |
Results, and results for the money
Stability and risk
The homebuyer’s real question: what is likely to change after I move in?
Ashburnham-Westminster
No stability flags raised.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
- Declining enrollment Enrollment fell more than 5% over five years. Enrollment decline is the single best predictor of school closures and programme cuts.
- High debt burden More than 10% of total spending goes to interest and debt retirement, money that cannot reach a classroom.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment change, 5 years | -4.2% | -5.4% |
| Long-term debt per student | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service share of spending | Locked | Locked |
Enrolling a child
The same checklist for both districts. Every "required" below links to the sentence it came from.
Ashburnham-Westminster
Ashburnham Westminster Regional School District - Enrollment
Registration runs through Infinite Campus. Read August 23, 2026.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
New Student Registration - Steamboat Springs School District
Read August 25, 2026.
Is a seat at your zoned school guaranteed?
Ashburnham-Westminster
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
- This is the district’s own published wording, not our summary of it. Policies are rewritten between enrollment seasons and a page can be out of date the day after we read it — the school office is the only authority on whether a particular grade at a particular school is full right now.
- A warning here is about capacity, not about your address. It does not mean your child will be moved; it means the district has told you in writing that it may move them.
- Required the page says so, and the sentence is quoted.
- Mentioned only it comes up, but not as a requirement — often a sentence saying the district cannot demand it.
- Not mentioned we read the page and it was not on it. That is not the same as "not required".
- Page not read we have no enrollment page for this district.
Documents to bring
How enrolling works
Locked 11 steps of the enrollment process — deadlines, appointments, proof of residency — are not shown. What to bring is above, and stays free.
- A blank row means the requirement did not appear on the district’s page. It does not mean the district will not ask for it — published lists are routinely incomplete, and the registrar has the final word.
- Requirements change every enrollment season. Check the district’s own page, linked above, before you gather anything.
- A district cannot condition enrollment on your child’s immigration status: under Plyler v. Doe (1982) every child resident in the district is entitled to a free public education. If a district asks for something that would reveal status, you are not obliged to provide it.
- If your family is in temporary or shared housing, the McKinney-Vento Act lets a child enrol immediately without the residency and records documents listed here. Ask for the district’s homeless liaison by name.
Comparability notes
- Cross-state comparison. Dollars below are shown both as reported and adjusted to a common price level, because a dollar buys different amounts of teacher in MA and CO.
- At least one district sits outside a metro area with its own published price index, so its cost adjustment uses the statewide index. That is a coarser adjustment.
What these numbers are, exactly
Who decides, and what it costs you
Every band above this one asks what a district spends. This one asks who chose to.
Ashburnham-Westminster
Local money, but not a school property tax
This district reports local revenue that is neither a property tax of its own nor a county appropriation, and the source is not named. Two thirds of the districts in this position are New England regional districts, where each member town raises its share — but the rest span Alaska, Arizona and Tennessee, whose arrangements are nothing like that and nothing like each other. What is certain is only that local money reaches these schools by some route the school board does not levy itself.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
The district levies its own school tax
This district raises property tax in its own name. Who sets the rate varies by state — an elected board in some, a public vote in others — but the levy is the school system’s own, and it is the part of a tax bill that school politics moves most directly.
| Ashburnham-Westminster | Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| School property tax levied, per student Only for districts that levy in their own name. Blank where the county or town levies instead — see the cards above, and read the next row. | — | $11,995 |
| Appropriated by the county or town, per student What the parent government handed the schools, for dependent systems. This is a general appropriation, not solely property tax. | — | — |
| Property tax as a share of all revenue How much of the budget rides on local property values, and therefore on local votes. | — | 49.0% |
| Long-term debt already owed, per student The balance at the end of the year, for scale. Repaid over decades, so it is a commitment made by earlier boards rather than a bill arriving now. | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service as a share of spending Interest plus principal repaid this year, against total spending. This is the part of the debt that is being paid now, out of money that would otherwise reach a classroom. | Locked | Locked |
| New long-term debt issued, per student Money borrowed during fiscal year 2024. What this figure does and does not tell you is set out under the table. | $0 | $0 |
- Ashburnham-Westminster: issued no new long-term debt in fiscal year 2024. That is a reported zero, not a gap in the data.
- Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2: issued no new long-term debt in fiscal year 2024. That is a reported zero, not a gap in the data.
- A figure in the borrowing row is not a bond voters approved. It records debt issued, and that includes refinancing existing debt at a new rate — which changes nothing about what a district owes — as well as certificates of participation and lease-revenue debt, which in many states a board can issue with no referendum at all. To find out what was actually on a ballot, check the county election office.
- Debt is repaid over decades. A large balance per student is a commitment made by earlier boards and earlier voters, not a bill arriving this year. The debt service row above it is the part being paid now.
Who sits on the board
Ashburnham-Westminster board of education
- Kyle Johnson — School Committee Member
- Winifred Kender — School Committee Member
- Jeremey Smeltekop — School Committee Member
- Jennifer Storm — School Committee Member
- Laura St. Cyr — School Committee Member
- Nadine Leger — School Committee Member
- Courtney Rose McGee — School Committee Member
- Janet Smith — School Committee Member
- Kimberly Russo — School Committee Member
- Wendy Smolinsky — School Committee Member
Read from the district’s own board page on 2026-08-24. Boards change; the district’s page is the current record, not ours.
These seats are elected, and what this board decides — the budget, the attendance boundaries, the calendar — is decided at a meeting the public may attend. The district’s own board page, linked above, is where it publishes the schedule and the agenda. We do not hold meeting dates or contact details for these people.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 board of education
- Kevin Callahan — President
- Lara Craig — Vice President
- Leah Helme — Secretary
- Kim Lemmer — Board Member
- Jane Toothaker — Treasurer
- The public may speak: “PUBLIC COMMENT DURING A BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING”
Read from the district’s own board page on 2026-08-24. Boards change; the district’s page is the current record, not ours.
These seats are elected, and what this board decides — the budget, the attendance boundaries, the calendar — is decided at a meeting the public may attend. The district’s own board page, linked above, is where it publishes the schedule and the agenda. We do not hold meeting dates or contact details for these people.
Funding measures on the ballot
Ashburnham-Westminster
We have not read MA’s election results, so this column is empty because of us and not because of Ashburnham-Westminster. Whether it has asked its voters for money is a question its county election office can answer and we cannot, yet.
Nobody has read MA’s school election results yet — that is a gap on our side, not a fact about this district. Its county elections office holds what it asked its voters for and what they answered, and that is a public record you can request. What it says is worth asking about at a board meeting.
Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
$133.9M approved by voters across 3 measures. A further $4.6M a year added to what the district may collect, across 3 measures.
| Election | Measure | Amount | Yes | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2019 | Bond | $79.5M | 50.6% | Passed |
Locked 9 earlier measures in this district’s history are not shown.
From the state’s own election file. Latest election on record: November 2023.
What this state publishes: Bond and mill levy override elections, as CDE records them, through 2023. Colorado districts put other questions to voters — kindergarten mill levies, and everything on a coordinated ballot that is not one of these two — and this file records none of them.
- A vote share is not an outcome. What it takes to carry varies by state and by measure — in some states a bond needs a supermajority and a minimum turnout while a levy on the same ballot needs half, so a clear majority can still lose. Every outcome shown here is copied from the state’s own election file, and the rule that applied is stated with the coverage above. Where that file stated no outcome we show whatever count it published and no verdict, rather than working one out from the percentage — and some states publish the ballot question without ever recording a count, so a blank there is a number nobody printed.
- These are the measures a district put to its voters, not its whole tax bill. A property tax bill also carries county, city and state levies that have nothing to do with schools, and in most states a school board can issue some kinds of debt with no vote at all.
The detailed figures for Ashburnham-Westminster and Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2
The verdict, the headline dollar, the funding shares, who is served and every comparability caveat are free above, and stay free. What is behind the lock is the detail you would want before acting on any of it:
- capital spending per student
- total revenue and total current spending, and the funding mix in dollars (the percentage shares stay free)
- the ten-line per-student breakdown of where the money goes
- counselor and administrator ratios, and the total salary bill
- the debt behind the risk flags — per student, and as a share of spending
- the enrollment process — deadlines, appointments and proof of residency
- the full ballot history: 9 more bonds and levies, with the amounts
$1.79 for both, for three months, 21 cents less than buying them one at a time.
The 3-month unlock is a single payment and does not renew; it simply ends. A subscription renews, monthly or yearly as chosen, until you cancel. No account to create: this purchase is held in this browser, so clearing site data or moving to another browser loses it, and the phone apps sell their own unlock through their own store. What to do if you lose it.
Compare something else
Ashburnham-Westminster on its own · Steamboat Springs School District No. Re 2 on its own